[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Adding OU with PSQL backend

Marcel Berteler <marcel.berteler@bdsolutions.co.za> writes:

> Dieter Kluenter wrote the following on 2009/04/21 13:35:
>> Marcel Berteler <marcel.berteler@bdsolutions.co.za> writes:
>>
>>
>>> Should this directive work?
>>>
>>> index          regDate eq
>>>
>>> Where regDate is defined as follows:
>>>
>>> attributetype ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.22371.1.1 NAME 'regDate'
>>>                DESC 'Registration Date'
>>>                EQUALITY generalizedTimeMatch
>>>                ORDERING generalizedTimeOrderingMatch
>>>                SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24
>>>                SINGLE-VALUE )
>>>
>>> I can not seem to find a index type that specifically mentions time matches.
>>>
>>
>> RFC-4517, section 3.3.13
>>
>>
>> -Dieter
>>
>>
> Dieter, maybe its me, but that section does not clarify what indexing
> directive I can use to speed up searching dates. It specifies the
> format and content of Generalized Time.

Just a few lines down, section 4.2.16 and 4.2.17
an equality index should be sufficient.

-Dieter

-- 
Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung
http://www.dpunkt.de/buecher/2104.html
sip: +49.180.1555.7770535
GPG Key ID:8EF7B6C6
53°08'09,95"N
10°08'02,42"E