>> > What attributes do you use in all your filters? >> > Do you see any "index_param failed (18)" errors in your ldap logs? >> > >> > >> > >> No, do not see that error. >> > > Your log level is 1. I am not sure if you would see this type of error > with such a log level. If you get a chance you may want to try log level > 256, which is more verbose, just for a while as higher log level does > impact performance. > I don't have any of these errors with loglevel at -1. > >> >> > I don't see any "cachesize" or "idlcachesize" directive in your >> > slapd.conf. You should definitely set them. >> > >> Any default or "safe" values for it? >> > > http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/1073.html > http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/190.html > http://www.stanford.edu/services/directory/openldap/configuration/slapd-c > onf-replica.html > Of these, the stanford page is the only one that provides any information about idlcachesize. I've implemented a 20000 size for the IDL cache and restarted my daemon. We'll see if that has any effect. Owen -- If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
Attachment:
pgpbeQWzaUSsH.pgp
Description: PGP signature