[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: 2.2.23's slapd segfaults when using ldapsearch

To: OpenLDAP software list <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: 2.2.23's slapd segfaults when using ldapsearch
From: Greg Petras <gpetme@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:16:48 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=p/CP+3GsZ6LRZhIzjknQ6dT0M8zOV9WsP2psQ2DpEc3MS/6imhbayJy9Hbh3CGOYsmla+y92u2bu3F/IVAZHEOdZCRKaiv4wau55wdO6Ajy9EhZHGJxGfWn7NKhbRkL5aFWIfX/4j3MZDt4yXvSGCdYPfm5VGox+XyjIBPY64WM=
In-reply-to: <ffa2dce10502020811216cb197@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ffa2dce1050131140173edc2ff@mail.gmail.com> <E29DBA72B20D4D7CD7EBFEF4@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu> <ffa2dce105020105354564ac2f@mail.gmail.com> <2D06D99A3449DB0302B3506B@10.0.0.1> <ffa2dce10502020811216cb197@mail.gmail.com>

Just an FYI - I recompiled Cyrus SASL 2.1.20 against MIT 1.4 (with
mutexes disabled, as recommended by Quanah), and slapd doesn't
segfault anymore. Now I guess I need to determine whether or not it
will be stable enough to use, of if I should switch to Heimdal
libraries, as Quanah also recommended. Does anyone else have good
experience one way or the other?

Thanks,

Greg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.2.23's slapd segfaults when using ldapsearch
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

References:
- Re: 2.2.23's slapd segfaults when using ldapsearch
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: 2.2.23's slapd segfaults when using ldapsearch
  - From: Greg Petras <gpetme@gmail.com>
- Re: 2.2.23's slapd segfaults when using ldapsearch
  - From: Greg Petras <gpetme@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: monitor backend ruins operational attributes search?
Next by Date: Re: monitor backend ruins operational attributes search?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread