[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ldapsearch supportedSASLMechanisms : ANONYMOUS is missing

To: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com>
Subject: Re: ldapsearch supportedSASLMechanisms : ANONYMOUS is missing
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:08:17 -0800
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <87sm596ahc.fsf@pumba.bayour.com>
References: <41E023A1.9000305@lexum.umontreal.ca> <20050108190353.GA4220@gargantubrain.pltg> <87u0pr7i53.fsf@pumba.bayour.com> <41E1985E.7080904@lexum.umontreal.ca> <87sm596ahc.fsf@pumba.bayour.com>

At 10:53 PM 1/9/2005, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
>>>>>> "FM" == FM  <dist-list@LEXUM.UMontreal.CA> writes:
>
>    FM> Thank you for the input, So the "supportedSASLMechanisms :
>    FM> ANONYMOUS" is not needed ?
>
>Yes. It (clients) needs to be able do do some anonymous searches
>before it can authenticate a user..

Then just allow LDAP anonymous searches, but don't bother
with the SASL ANONYMOUS mechanism.  

Kurt

References:
- ldapsearch supportedSASLMechanisms : ANONYMOUS is missing
  - From: FM <dist-list@LEXUM.UMontreal.CA>
- Re: ldapsearch supportedSASLMechanisms : ANONYMOUS is missing
  - From: Karsten Gorling <kgorling@physik.tu-berlin.de>
- Re: ldapsearch supportedSASLMechanisms : ANONYMOUS is missing
  - From: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com>
- Re: ldapsearch supportedSASLMechanisms : ANONYMOUS is missing
  - From: FM <dist-list@LEXUM.UMontreal.CA>
- Re: ldapsearch supportedSASLMechanisms : ANONYMOUS is missing
  - From: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ssl and openldap
Next by Date: Re: ssl and openldap
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread