[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: substring search problem



  > Is it a matching rule problem?
> The equality for employes is distinguishedNameMatch, is it correct for 
> substring search?
> 
Why dont u try

        EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
        SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "MESSNER D" <messner_d@yahoo.fr>
To: <OpenLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 1:52 PM
Subject: substring search problem


> Hello I want to do a search in a multi valued attribute in that base:
> 
> ou=agence
> 
> objectclass:agency
> o=Lille
> employes: uid=dupont,ou=employes,dc=xxx
>                 uid=dmessner,ou=employes,dc=xxx
>                 uid=durant,ou=employes,dc=xxx
>                 uid=henri,ou=employes,dc=xxx
> 
> 
> objectclass:agency
> o=Marseille
> employes: uid=richard,ou=employes,dc=xxx
>                 uid=paul,ou=employes,dc=xxx
>                 uid=jack,ou=employes,dc=xxx
>                 uid=pierre,ou=employes,dc=xxx
> 
> 
> I want to search the object with 
> (&(objectclass=agency)(employes="uid=dmessner*") and I don't know why it 
> doesn't work
> It works with (&(objectclass=agency)(o=L*)) but I don't want to find an 
> agency by its name but by the employee into it.
> Is it a matching rule problem?
> The equality for employes is distinguishedNameMatch, is it correct for 
> substring search?
> 


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.686 / Virus Database: 447 - Release Date: 5/14/2004