[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: BDB-4.2.52 bug (Was Initial 2.2.4 exploration results)

On that patch, I assume that the lines marked with a "+" should be added, and the lines marked with a "-" should be deleted?

Thanks.

- DAP

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> [mailto:owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Quanah
> Gibson-Mount
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 7:39 PM
> To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> Subject: BDB-4.2.52 bug (Was Initial 2.2.4 exploration results)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --On Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:07 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount 
> <quanah@stanford.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
> > I've also had one case under syncRepl that changes made to 
> the master
> > didn't end up in the master's DB when the replica had been 
> attached, then
> > de-attached, and the BDB ended up being corrupted, causing 
> me to have to
> > run db_recover before the master would work again, and 
> having to re-add
> > the changes.
> 
> This is due to a bug in BDB 4.2.52.  All users of BDB-4.2.52 
> should apply 
> the following patch:
> 
> <http://www.sleepycat.com/update/4.2.52/patch.4.2.52.html>
> 
> (Thanks Howard for finding this!)
> 
> I've verified that applying this patch removes this deadlock 
> situation.
> 
> --Quanah
> 
> --
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Principal Software Developer
> ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
> ITSS/TSS/Infrastructure Operations
> Stanford University
> GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
> 
>