Re: RE24 testing call #1 (OL 2.4.24)

[Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>]

Quanah Gibson-Mount writes:
> This was just a checkpoint to make sure what was done so far doesn't break 
> anything.

Ah, OK.
>> Some issues it'd be nice to have in, if they're simple for those who
>> know the code in question:
>>
>> ITS#6760 rwm broken entry handling
>>   Fixed, I think, but needs review
> 
> This will be in the next set.

Someone's OKed it?  I copied/moved what some of the code was doing, but
I don't know why it was doing it.  (Noted in the ITS.)

>> ITS#6532 Support for common orderingMatching rules in extensible match
>> filters   TODO: Handle CSN and UUID ordering match too?
>>   (Almost certainly OK, but I wanted someone who knows to say so. It's
>>   a two-line update, setting the SLAP_MR_EXT flag for these rules.)
>>
>> Also, possibly the rest of "ITS#6739 broken do_syncrep2()" is simple.
>> Almost fixed.
> 
> If you get these committed, I can add them.

I've committed my part, but someone who knows syncrepl must do the rest.

-- 
Hallvard