[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Dynamic syntax support vs. slapo-constraint vs. schema declaration vs. whatever

To: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Subject: Re: Dynamic syntax support vs. slapo-constraint vs. schema declaration vs. whatever
From: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@netbsd.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:28:14 +0000
Cc: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>, OpenLDAP-devel@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <474BF595.9060409@stroeder.com>
References: <4728F215.5010502@symas.com> <474BF595.9060409@stroeder.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:46:45AM +0100, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Dynamic option value/description lists could be easily defined by
> defining an LDAP URL which searches the option values. IIRC someone is
> already working in this direction to improve slapo-constraint.

I contributed something that sounds like this, but it's burried in ITS:
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Contrib?id=4987;expression=slapo-constraint

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu@netbsd.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dynamic syntax support vs. slapo-constraint vs. schema declaration vs. whatever
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- Dynamic syntax support vs. slapo-constraint vs. schema declaration vs. whatever
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>

Prev by Date: Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd connection.c daemon.c proto-slap.h syncrepl.c
Next by Date: Re: Dynamic syntax support vs. slapo-constraint vs. schema declaration vs. whatever
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread