[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: syncrepl questions

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: syncrepl questions
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:58:52 -0700
Cc: Jonghyuk Choi <jongchoi@us.ibm.com>, openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <755859057.1064396192@cadabra.stanford.edu>
References: <OF46C8CB65.AA27CCFF-ON85256DAB.0010D31C-85256DAB.00176890@us.ib m.com> <438193929.1064355775@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu> <6.0.0.22.0.20030924105901.02af1c20@127.0.0.1> <755859057.1064396192@cadabra.stanford.edu>

--On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:36 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu> wrote:

I've changed back to persist mode, which is where I started at.  If
syncrepl is not suited to large scale deployments/deployments with
frequent updates, does this mean the various ITS's against slurpd will be
dropped back into the queue to be fixed, instead of suspended?

Oh, neat, never mind -- I see some of my suspended ones are already addressed in 2.2.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

References:
- Re: syncrepl questions
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: syncrepl questions
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: syncrepl questions
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: syncrepl questions
Next by Date: BDB out of lockers
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread