[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [SOLVED] Re: chain overlay does an anonymous bind and ignores the chain binddn (v2.4.44)

To: "openldap-technical@openldap.org" <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Re: chain overlay does an anonymous bind and ignores the chain binddn (v2.4.44)
From: mailing lists <listas.correo@yahoo.es>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 07:26:10 +0000 (UTC)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s2048; t=1494401173; bh=VKmALivYfNFoocRGECxO5V1oYzo9Yw6SWieNCe4Z3+E=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=t80Ln/vhpHVK6agvhkYcXFVkYRisMwhB++0TbMl+AamvUodndivXzYFlxXqBtkMEf5GPSVc+yURXcsxlEOvtBRLnRIv8MPE9Aw+Y36EULjKv+2dRg2p2AG2iBRNv5pm40zGHV2D/ctQm7g0sVhLcRoVuc37r70FcDB8vUFZxQ7yELtVENs4V9ekFHrBe1YWSiKNOMqN530zU+0Fu9Y2+WfwaADdmXDdsMn6ksWu0JapIlwiaHDwjYAhDdTTeMKBGV3Oe/HQaOAhQ/jxKh5XfjOyi+P4zrXsHQpob5h6Ho7/C7tiwA1A8WHJfXZiuGDdjHEmZYqxTOtsr7LRrHJWRkA==
In-reply-to: <B8CC57D66A041DC0AD0E0099@[192.168.1.19]>
References: <685444107.6182891.1492688188961.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <685444107.6182891.1492688188961@mail.yahoo.com> <WM!329d10ddee4d4a598a488a9e301355e8c89e0431d2af68bea710359741596085c7f7f819dff9c27c436b5cf44792b1f0!@mailstronghold-2.zmailcloud.com> <40cf40e4-9683-444a-35aa-1bf715d111dd@symas.com> <2102133683.1034802.1493734999387@mail.yahoo.com> <1270246176.5541378.1493976453016@mail.yahoo.com> <WM!c1ee84f102b801ce472e98760c131bd96a9ebd2da30e1039892559f2b84deda56d389bf858bd2be60ee6f0d6ea798410!@mailstronghold-1.zmailcloud.com> <D9904EB8C3F7A1912B892F01@[192.168.1.19]> <502880873.8746947.1494242190597@mail.yahoo.com> <WM!1755e124e1b9b9bbff7cb9559531ca8f759b2d31e7f7e88c69890108806c48652d22b0046c41ce8c762e941aa9c8d274!@mailstronghold-3.zmailcloud.com> <B8CC57D66A041DC0AD0E0099@[192.168.1.19]>

On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 5:26 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com> wrote:

> Please see <http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=7768>, it looks
> like you would need to set a corresponding olcDbUri attribute to match your
> updateref value
>
> Can you let me know if this resolves the issue? If so, I can update the
> documentation accordingly.

confirmed, it works as long as both directives (updateref and chain-uri) have the same host:port combination.

Thanks it was not very clear to me.

References:
- Re: chain overlay does an anonymous bind and ignores the chain binddn (v2.4.44)
  - From: mailing lists <listas.correo@yahoo.es>
- [SOLVED] Re: chain overlay does an anonymous bind and ignores the chain binddn (v2.4.44)
  - From: mailing lists <listas.correo@yahoo.es>
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: chain overlay does an anonymous bind and ignores the chain binddn (v2.4.44)
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: chain overlay does an anonymous bind and ignores the chain binddn (v2.4.44)
  - From: mailing lists <listas.correo@yahoo.es>
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: chain overlay does an anonymous bind and ignores the chain binddn (v2.4.44)
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [SOLVED] Re: chain overlay does an anonymous bind and ignores the chain binddn (v2.4.44)
Next by Date: Re: overlay ppolicy - atribute pwdhistory
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread