[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: bind using CN instead of UID

To: Craig White <craig.white@ttiltd.com>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: bind using CN instead of UID
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:54:01 -0700
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <FFB1FDE1-2425-45B0-A4D5-D5BAB5898222@ttiltd.com>
References: <FFB1FDE1-2425-45B0-A4D5-D5BAB5898222@ttiltd.com>

--On Thursday, October 06, 2011 9:50 AM -0700 Craig White<craig.white@ttiltd.com> wrote:

# cwhite, people, ttinet.local
dn: uid=cwhite,ou=people,dc=ttinet,dc=local
cn: Craig White

# ldapsearch -x -D 'cn=Craig White,ou=people,dc=ttinet,dc=local' -W
What is it that I am missing?

An understanding of LDAP. -D specifies the entry DN. "cn=CraigWhite,ou=people,dc=ttinet,dc=local" is clearly NOT the DN of the entry asyour own search results from the first bind show you.


--Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

References:
- bind using CN instead of UID
  - From: Craig White <craig.white@ttiltd.com>

Prev by Date: Patching openldap?
Next by Date: Re: Ldap logs accounting
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread