[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Which backend should I use?

To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Which backend should I use?
From: Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:16:13 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0ABAc1Y3LmlztAeC0dh1YWih4YykiXDOKI2DzvYJlWc=; b=lXDu8Wepop0jIjw8Rj/qIJ+TUFKXe1X9Nlxhuynbd1RhvHUSb2DwSpdv/SuiRqcl0E rdki5LzhjK/u0C80nT5l2KEp5HfUeaV7dfAmz2niTCXY+OOQHHAnRyO1bnrnvta3aZce eBdL3SqMeN6zgzh8aVJUxfhLB35Yzhu348C4g=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pD2uwU9sYqqz/CfqBXTkhH+/tHhNr/7KmOcZhISxkzNhlFWzKHxpQ3UI/Ixza2wYvh 2Qfj0gge6GRPr/qVdUU1G0D4ryRX/OHqVjFGayOguTctMBfnNPCf668oAyCqIkIqAYvb 912lUGnHYYzgs4vvuxBFeSkXb6T3yS+LblLbA=
In-reply-to: <45D3C8C1-71B2-43C8-A87C-BBA8F244F70A@zimbra.com>
References: <4D4A69A5.8030802@univ-orleans.fr> <AANLkTikSsWw16mpZLMj8tmWc4sTJYJ3d19OkUVayAxF2@mail.gmail.com> <45D3C8C1-71B2-43C8-A87C-BBA8F244F70A@zimbra.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7

On 2/3/11 5:45 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:


On Feb 3, 2011, at 1:11 AM, Clément OUDOT<clem.oudot@gmail.com>  wrote:

Le 3 février 2011 09:39, Olivier PAVILLA
<olivier.pavilla@univ-orleans.fr>  a écrit :

Hi.
I need your advice again :)
I have LDAP server with ldbm database on a fedora core 5 which is
running for more than 3 years without any update nor upgrade neither. So
now I've to migate this old LDAP on a new server with new Linux
distribution (Debian Lenny). I'm tune up both /etc/ldap/slapd.conf and
/var/lib/ldap/DB_CONFIG. But right now I read on a website
(http://linagora.org/contrib/annuaires/documentations/openldap_guide_installation)
that backend bdb will disappear. Should I use backend hdb or it doesn't
make something different?

Hi Olivier,

we never write that bdb will disappear, but just than it is now better
to use hdb. Maybe someone on this list can argue ont this

As far as I am aware, you are not a member of the OpenLDAP project team, so I am not sure why you write emails that tend to imply that you are.

If you re-read Clément's mail, he does not claim to be a member of theOpenLDAP team. He just said :

"we never write (implied : on the Linagora's blog) that bdb willdisappear..."

Clément is a Linagora's Employee, and he carefully replied that what'son the Linagora's blog can be challenged by people on this list. Thatwas a sane mail, IMO.


--

Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which backend should I use?
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

References:
- Which backend should I use?
  - From: Olivier PAVILLA <olivier.pavilla@univ-orleans.fr>
- Re: Which backend should I use?
  - From: Clément OUDOT <clem.oudot@gmail.com>
- Re: Which backend should I use?
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Which backend should I use?
Next by Date: Re: AccessLog behaviour
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread