[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: [Fwd: Support for ordering matching rules in extensible match filters?]
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:15 PM +0200 email@example.com wrote:
Could someone please explain to me why openldap currently doesn't support
for example 'caseIgnoreOrderingMatch' (which is listed in section 4.2 of
RFC4517) in extensible match filters? Of course I've seen the two SHOULDs
above - I just don't understand the openldap related technical/design
decision regarding the missing support and would be very happy if someone
could please explain this to me.
Probably no one has implemented them previously. You could file an ITS
with your contribution for consideration at
<http://www.openldap.org/its>. Make sure you read the contribution
Ok, I've filed an ITS. Its ID is 6532.