[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: top-level data entries not replicating, 2.4.15, now 2.4.17
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org, Quanah Gibson-Mount <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: top-level data entries not replicating, 2.4.15, now 2.4.17
- From: Brian Neu <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1251163707; bh=kxIpy+fsm7ejqSU6hNx+XcfsRkJRli0RgfH9hhA/yiA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4oAeeI3sKafauO/a2SiCeOvud3xGs+2HsIPQfVck56KyXR9o5zAUfi7oGS/ZLLao5uMHN/o38pvjyXEND4oQxUmtX7OCeKhtJI7d4TD1XdY3SRtpGMGnBXCOq1FETU+o01mAuf7CKTnnTciMisiZNZics772ibH/dSPOMyYA5io=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=d6pRTF7xASjBVE4/W8rwurYesGJ16k7ocRfEDGLXbu8KuWB1M1oHeut08G/bWu0FSCYLctv3ajMpsYUQClEr96nhwLuY0RGE/TbE1HOOgwzXpVz0yG6cEgIogJyJNg4K+Sm616NS8QGmlOvQfGoIJ2subwyzrqgsUpT2iv80/T0=;
- In-reply-to: <A4109C75264E47696F6E9501@[192.168.1.199]>
--- On Mon, 8/24/09, Quanah Gibson-Mount <email@example.com> wrote:
> From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: top-level data entries not replicating, 2.4.15, now 2.4.17
> To: "Brian Neu" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
> Date: Monday, August 24, 2009, 9:11 PM
> --On Monday, August 24, 2009 6:03 PM
> -0700 Brian Neu
> >> If that works, then yes, using slapd -d -1 and
> >> that to a file may
> >> indicate why they aren't replicating.
> >> --Quanah
> > From what I can tell by looking at the provider log
> (-1), new top-level
> > entries are added to the provider correctly, and to
> the accesslog on the
> > provider, but I'm not familiar enough with the
> OpenLDAP code to be
> > certain.
> > Can anyone test to see if they experience the same
> Err, sorry. I meant run slapd -d -1 on the replica,
> to see why it isn't
> replicating those entries.
Unfortunately, not until tomorrow eve, EST. The consumer server (victory3) is temporarily in someone's office before it goes to a colo, and was turned off due to the fan noise for the biz day. It SHOULD have been powered back on, but someone forgot.
Aren't there a couple of virtual servers somewhere that serve as testing grounds for the project? That, or does someone have a provider->consumer set-up in production that can test a benign top-level data entry and see if it replicates?