[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Mistake in the doc ?
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Buchan Milne
> On Friday 29 August 2008 17:02:01 Vincent Panel wrote:
>> Maybe I don't understand but, I'm looking at § 184.108.40.206 in this
>> document : http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin22/schema.html
>> The goal is to create an attributetype called "myUniqueName" which is
>> unique. With the last definition of this attributetype :
>> attributetype ( 220.127.116.11.1 NAME 'myUniqueName'
>> DESC 'unique name with my organization'
>> SUP name )
>> How can openldap guess that we cant a unique attributetype ?
> I don't see anything in the document you refer to that implies that slapd will
> enforce uniqueness on the attribute. It only states that organisations may
> maintain a unique ID (but does not state how).
>> Isn't there a SINGLE-VALUE missing at the end of the description ?
> Uniqueness is orthogonal to being multi-valued.
Ok, I didn't quite understand the meaning of SINGLE-VALUE, I see now.
But look at § 18.104.22.168 : in the first example, SINGLE-VALUE is
specified and not in the second example. Is this because "name" is
already single-valued ?