[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: poor performance of db-4.8.26?

To: openldap-software@openldap.org
Subject: Re: poor performance of db-4.8.26?
From: "Dieter Kluenter" <dieter@dkluenter.de>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:04:48 +0100
In-reply-to: <4B942180.1050704@symas.com> (Howard Chu's message of "Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:58:24 -0800")
References: <87bpf02woy.fsf@rubin.avci.de> <87d3zgcgr4.fsf@rubin.avci.de> <4B942180.1050704@symas.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.5-b28 (linux)

Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com> writes:

> Dieter Kluenter wrote:
>> "Dieter Kluenter"<dieter@dkluenter.de>  writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm just testing performance of db-4.5.20 vs. db-4.8.26 and found that
>>> db-4.8.26 much slower than db-4.5.20.
>
>> Is there any advantage in building with db-4.8.26?
>
> On Solaris we've run into deadlocks with db-4.7.25 that were fixed by
> switching to db-4.8. Haven't seen the same situation on Linux.

I ran into deadlocks on Debian and db-4.8.26 on heavy write
operations.

-Dieter

-- 
Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung
http://dkluenter.de
GPG Key ID:8EF7B6C6
53°37'09,95"N
10°08'02,42"E

Follow-Ups:
- Status of OpenLdap (2.5?) regarding LDAP transaction support
  - From: hptf <hptf@free.fr>

References:
- poor performance of db-4.8.26?
  - From: "Dieter Kluenter" <dieter@dkluenter.de>
- Re: poor performance of db-4.8.26?
  - From: "Dieter Kluenter" <dieter@dkluenter.de>
- Re: poor performance of db-4.8.26?
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Using back-ldap as a client-side proxy/cache
Next by Date: Status of OpenLdap (2.5?) regarding LDAP transaction support
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread