[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: trouble setting initial replication between multiple masters
- To: Guillaume Rousse <Guillaume.Rousse@inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: trouble setting initial replication between multiple masters
- From: FRLinux <frlinux@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:43:28 +0000
- Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=96VRnypKRSDNFZk1eMUotkCN/RNQbnZnYIzRV9fFPRs=; b=LjHU4uB6u/w1G/MR5Ojkcj87qiutknxa+pNTr0yCWNZ20kmSIwF6b5rq/UCtJmcO+X i/K4DqWBq+zKLMBtzQuUGQCoAL/cGopvrCBAq+PatW3jM5dmDX2cAUC9HRjtEmq8KyGf cdZjIC0ES396wRhBPAnfatyVkzdLlcgK/29mk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=rgUqNBU/qZVFkv09p9wp833bSBlafBzsdhhJ+8x3Np687PcwW+sSIh5+ytKAGxo9bF olxca3gsqKOpS5Jxt26UbxEb8MKrL0kHogsZEyO3mZhKDmvp9FeO8dBuVbG724Nd8IMn Ma8VZHTSGy5H3ThwlVq6sfT91P5FojTPhictM=
- In-reply-to: <4B54808D.6070303@inria.fr>
- References: <4B4DA0FC.8060607@inria.fr> <4B54808D.6070303@inria.fr>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Guillaume Rousse
<Guillaume.Rousse@inria.fr> wrote:
> Is this really necessary to check constraint violations when using syncrepl
> ? We already have a 'schemachecking' directive, we may have an additional
> 'constraintchecking' one. At least, an explicit error message for 'sync'
> level would have been more meaningful.
I haven't followed the beginning of this thread but I lately moved
many replicas to OpenLDAP 2.4 and found it easier to just remove
schemachecking in my case. That said, we don't have a big database nor
big writes. A couple of additional schemas but all standard (courier,
samba, etc...)
Cheers,
Steph