[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Paged Results Control questions

To: openldap-software@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Paged Results Control questions
From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:30:16 +0200
Cc: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>, "Maier, Nathan" <nmaier@unimax.com>
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <A1883958D6246245910936E23B87D3370CFC2E55@ZO.unimax.com>
References: <A1883958D6246245910936E23B87D3370CFC2D48@ZO.unimax.com> <49920BF3.3020703@sys-net.it> <A1883958D6246245910936E23B87D3370CFC2E55@ZO.unimax.com>
User-agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27.7-desktop-1mnb; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; )

On Wednesday 11 February 2009 18:24:22 Maier, Nathan wrote:
> > I don't know in detail about 2.2.28, but OpenLDAP 2.2 should support
> > that control when back-bdb is used.  However I think nobody really
> > bothers about checking such an outdated version (the current is
>
> 2.4.13).
>
> It's not really by choice that I'm dealing with 2.2.28 unfortunately.
> What is back-bdb?  I haven't been able to find any documentation on it.

The bdb database backend, IOW, used as follows:

database bdb

If you have instead:

database ldbm

then you are using the ldbm backend, and you can expect:
1)Data corruption
2)Scalability problems
3)No database recovery options
4)No paged results

Switch to bdb (but, you should consider upgrading as well).

Regards,
Buchan

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Paged Results Control questions
  - From: "Maier, Nathan" <nmaier@unimax.com>

References:
- Paged Results Control questions
  - From: "Maier, Nathan" <nmaier@unimax.com>
- Re: Paged Results Control questions
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
- RE: Paged Results Control questions
  - From: "Maier, Nathan" <nmaier@unimax.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Paged Results Control questions
Next by Date: Re: Problem with rwm overlay when used with translucent
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread