[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: slapo-rwm and rewriteRules
Pierangelo Masarati <email@example.com> wrote:
> Because the purpose of slapo-rwm is to muck with naming contexts to
> implement virtual views on data. Arbitrary access to attribute values
> means mucking with users' data, which is considered a bad practice. In
> any case, feel free to remove that limitation by modifying slapo-rwm's code.
The attribute I wanted to remap was handled by slapo-dynlist. I already
addressed that in slapo-dynlist itself.