[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: 2.4.6 prov/con, delta-syncrepl and auditContext
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Gavin Henry wrote:
If this sounds so unreasonable, please suggest (and code) a
better strategy. I'm open to everything (including zapping auditContext
at all, unless anyone out there finds it useful and is actively using it).
Not unreasonable, just *totally* undocumented. It is, IMHO, a major
missing part in the "Changes Since last version" section in the Admin
"major" ? Hardly.
It's not even in *any* man pages in HEAD.
So Syncrepl won't work in 2.4 on any consumer, where the provider has
accesslog enabled, i.e. delta-syncrepl.
Obviously that statement is false.
Much appreciated for the feedback Ando. Time for me to get writing ;-)
Perhaps we should really find a better solution, rather than document a
hack. What surprises me is that this change has been in HEAD (and, I
believe, in 2.4) for at least a year, and nobody noticed it.
It went unnoticed because in general, it had zero impact. As Gavin pointed
out, test043 still works fine, even without the schema definition.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/