[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: loglevel question

Piotr Wadas <pwadas@jewish.org.pl> writes:

> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>> Quanah Gibson-Mount writes:
>> >--On Sunday, October 21, 2007 1:55 PM +0200 Piotr Wadas
>> ><pwadas@jewish.org.pl> wrote:

> Probably implementing another configuration option, or some overlay (?), 
> would be easiest way to implement suffix-related (not 
> database/backend-related), independent logging, or independent 
> size/timelimit override... Interesting, that global loglevel option
> can include value of 1024, related only to shell backend.
> Anyway, seems clearly to me, that suffix/backend logging is currently
> unavailable, thanks anyway.

You may have a look at accesslog overlay which logs database related
operations, man slapo-accesslog, or auditlog overlay, man


Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung