[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: slurpd from a
- To: Alec Thomas <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: slurpd from a
- From: Howard Chu <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:24:09 -0700
- Cc: Buchan Milne <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, Aaron Richton <email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <Pine.SOC.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.9a3pre) Gecko/20070328 SeaMonkey/1.5a
Alec Thomas wrote:
On 3/27/07, Aaron Richton <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
You can "push" from syncrepl today. See the list archives and, I believe,
the tests configs.
As I understand it, and other threads confirm, even though syncrepl
logically supports a "push" based mechanism, from a network
perspective it's a connection from the replica to the master which is
not ideal from a DMZ.
That's syncrepl by itself, yes. Using syncrepl in conjunction with
back-ldap provides a pure push based mechanism though.
From a previous thread , it sounds like 2.4 will support this model
using a hidden proxy database. For 2.3 it sounds like it may be
possible by using the attr keyword to the replica statement. I'll play
with this tomorrow.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/