[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Another ACL question about set usage

> Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:

> This is an interesting setup. Usually I would make such associations
> explicit
> using an "owner" attribute or somesuch. It feels like what's wanted here
> is a
> "dynamic member" type of attribute, the opposite of a dynamic group. The
> main
> point being there should be an explicit DN-valued attribute associating an
> email address entry to all of its user entries. Probably the refint
> overlay
> could be enhanced to maintain this type of relation. As things currently
> are,
> you'd have to use some external procedures to keep such an attribute up to
> date.

I should definitely revitalize and fix my memberof overlay...


Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team

SysNet s.n.c.
Via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
Office:   +39.02.23998309
Mobile:   +39.333.4963172
Email:    pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it