[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Replication errors with slurpd and ppolicy
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Gavin Henry wrote:
yes, but according to  and other sources the current
refreshAndPersist is not a pure push solution. It's still the slave that
initiates the connection. To me it looked as I'd have to wait for 2.4.
Correct me if I'm wrong as I might misinterpret the docs, however. Have
you tested this and confirmed it works?
No, you are right. I misunderstood your requirement for a push based
I need to check, but what 2.4 does is provide a facility for push-like
sync-replication; however, the latest 2.3 should allow to proxy syncrepl
by means of a regular proxy. Namely, what test045 does should be
possible with 2.3 as well, at the cost of an extra instance of slapd for
proxying, while what test048 does requires something specific to 2.4.
Again: this needs to be checked, since 2.3 might still miss some details.
It should work fine in 2.3, with the constraints you listed.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc
OpenLDAP Core Team http://www.openldap.org/project/