[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: different seperator in dnstyle authz-regex / access? [auf Viren überprüft]

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: different seperator in dnstyle authz-regex / access? [auf Viren überprüft]
From: Hans Moser <hans.moser@ofd-sth.niedersachsen.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:39:28 +0100
Cc: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
In-reply-to: <459D300A.1020109@sys-net.it>
References: <459CD8D9.2040305@ofd-sth.niedersachsen.de> <459D300A.1020109@sys-net.it>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Pierangelo Masarati schrieb:

Traditionally, "access" used "dn=<pattern>", while "authz*" used "dn:<pattern>"; when styles came in, each context preserved the related separator. I don't see a big inconsistency here, since the contexts of application of each configuration syntax are well separated.

I'm OK with that. :)

Hans

References:
- different seperator in dnstyle authz-regex / access?
  - From: Hans Moser <hans.moser@ofd-sth.niedersachsen.de>
- Re: different seperator in dnstyle authz-regex / access?
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>

Prev by Date: Re: Multiple instances of object class in a record
Next by Date: Modifying existing schema definition without reimporting data ?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread