[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: ldap replication half functional
- To: Sergio Shevtsov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: ldap replication half functional
- From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:16:03 -0700
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Content-disposition: inline
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
--On Sunday, October 29, 2006 2:09 AM -0300 Sergio Shevtsov
I'm using Debian Serge 3.1 (testing) with Ldap that come by default.
You suggest the use of syncrepl intstead of slurpd is better.
But i steel dont understand why slurpd fails. I just create another
Why syncrepl y better instead of slurpd?
Thanks for your time.
Please keep replies to the list.
syncrepl is better because it understands doing replication from multiple
backends very easily, while with slurpd, you can do it, but it is more
difficult. slurpd is being deprecated and will eventually be removed from
OpenLDAP as syncrepl is a superior replication mechanism.
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html