[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: bdb backend - reliable or not?
- To: "Tomasz Chmielewski" <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: bdb backend - reliable or not?
- From: "matthew sporleder" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:06:20 -0400
- Cc: openldap <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
- Content-disposition: inline
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BgqR4YNcLCfgUqb6VTMgMqzBK8d6IuHwWLBBvA3kV+A+aY+H0dpVdxOs9LHb7NK7R5L/CINkIysmxjJQPZxVK9OE3/8P6uKKnvlvI07DlrV3kmWCKk8xtMugO23vh7XQblaPbTVqJgIfipe5SkLfu0ZmFqtiW7fhuMx1iPLR/+s=
- In-reply-to: <44BF8C40.email@example.com>
- References: <44BF3D9B.firstname.lastname@example.org> <44BF8C40.email@example.com>
That special startup script is only for 2.2. As your logs show,
openldap attempted to automatically recover. You can try running
db_recover manually, and see if that works.
On 7/20/06, Tomasz Chmielewski <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Performance is not an issue here, databases are relatively small.
> What is important is the ability to survive unexpected system
I digged a bit in the mailing list, and found that OpenLDAP with bdb
backend needs a special startup script to recover from such situations.
Too bad it isn't mentioned, even short and briefly, in OpenLDAP Admin Guide.
My 2 cents.