[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Shell backend: read_and_send_results
Timur Izhbulatov writes:
> So what's the plan now? We are open for further cooperation
> and finally we would be happy to have that fixed in trunk.
It's fixed in the cvs HEAD branch, with the change I posted plus a new
variant of the original reason atoi() was replaced. Some other cleanup
remains, see ITS#4495.
The current fix can easily be imported to the 2.3 branch, whenever the
next 2.3 release occurs. Possibly the upcoming cleanup will be for 2.4
only, I don't know yet.