[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Shell backend: read_and_send_results

Timur Izhbulatov writes:
> So what's the plan now?  We are open for further cooperation
> and finally we would be happy to have that fixed in trunk.

It's fixed in the cvs HEAD branch, with the change I posted plus a new
variant of the original reason atoi() was replaced.  Some other cleanup
remains, see ITS#4495.

The current fix can easily be imported to the 2.3 branch, whenever the
next 2.3 release occurs.  Possibly the upcoming cleanup will be for 2.4
only, I don't know yet.