[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: substring match vs. insignificant space removal

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: substring match vs. insignificant space removal
From: Donn Cave <donn@u.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:40:12 -0800
Cc: OpenLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.0.20060323143530.037a9e10@OpenLDAP.org>
References: <85d6be850602170156o2b4a862eq@mail.gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.0.20060217072352.022972d0@OpenLDAP.org> <85d6be850602170745v619816ebq@mail.gmail.com> <AE908EC5-690F-4FE6-BA46-B9CAE3EC214B@u.washington.edu> <7.0.1.0.0.20060323143530.037a9e10@OpenLDAP.org>

On Mar 23, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:

The relevant specification is   draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes
+ draft-ietf-ldapbis-strprep (both in doc/drafts), both
approved as a Proposed Standard.  slapd(8) has not yet been
updated to be fully compliant with this specification.


Thanks, very interesting!  A test with a more recent version
shows improvement (from my point of view, anyway) - I should
have checked that.

	Donn Cave, donn@u.washington.edu

References:
- substring match vs. insignificant space removal
  - From: Donn Cave <donn@u.washington.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: back-ldap with glue overlay
Next by Date: ppolicy: ppolicy_hash_cleartext not working
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread