On 1/23/06 12:59 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Monday, January 23, 2006 9:04 AM -0500 Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu> wrote:
Now, I have discovered three things.
1) delta-syncrepl doesn't seem to have any way to filter the amount of what is sent -- so, it has the same issues that I'm fighting with slurpd of sending every update to all the replicas and perhaps I do not want all the updates on all the replicas (this was the reason for me going to syncrepl).
You could, of course, have more than one accesslog database, each with what you wanted going to the different replicas. Or, alternately, you should be able to use a filter similar to what you configured for syncRepl for use with delta-syncrepl on the accesslog DB.
Yes, I suppose I could, but I don't seem to be intelligent enough to figure out how to filter what gets put into the accesslog based on whether or not the DN is in the correct branch of the DIT.
I've probably allowed too much in a single database, and now I want to send all the updates to one class of replicas and everything except the sendmail access control entries to another class of replicas -- of course, this is because slurpd is getting behind from time to time -- perhaps delta-syncrepl will be fast enough that this will not be an issue.
--Quanah
-- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Developer ITSS/Shared Services Stanford University GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html