[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Translucent overlay odds?

To: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
Subject: Re: Translucent overlay odds?
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 17:23:53 -0800
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <1131816909.3632.56.camel@ando>
References: <1131816909.3632.56.camel@ando>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20051027 SeaMonkey/1.1a

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:

Is local addition intended to be supported?  Yes, apparently, according
to the man page; but I note this case is not tested in test034.  So my
question is: does my approach make sense, should this be possible and
it's not happening because of a bug, or is my design flawed?

No, the current design of the translucent overlay does not allow totally local entries to exist. I.e., there must be a corresponding remote entry. Also, it expects the local and remote DB to have the same suffix.

--
 -- Howard Chu
 Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
 Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc
 OpenLDAP Core Team            http://www.openldap.org/project/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Translucent overlay odds?
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>

References:
- Translucent overlay odds?
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>

Prev by Date: Translucent overlay odds?
Next by Date: Re: Translucent overlay odds?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread