[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Problems with ldapadd
At 04:20 PM 6/20/2005, Andreas Bauer wrote:
>I think, there is something wrong with the lidf files
Yes. You should correct the problems indicated by ldapadd(1).
adding new entry "dc=samba,dc=org"
ldap_add: Naming violation (64)
additional info: naming attribute 'dc' is not present in entry
adding new entry "cn=admin,dc=samba,dc=org"
ldap_add: Object class violation (65)
additional info: no structural object class provided
That is, you should ensure entries represented in the LDIF
conform to LDAP/X.500 models. If you do not understand
these models, I suggest you read a good book on the subject
and ask questions as necessary on a list intended for general
discussions about LDAP. See http://www.openldap.org/lists/
and the FAQ for suggestions regarding books and lists.