[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Upgrading OpenLDAP, problem with data (no structural object class).
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Andrew McCall wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> In upgrading my OpenLDAP to an earlier version, I have realised how
> "incorrect" the data is in it, and am now sifting through about 3000
> entries to try and stuff the contents back in it! One of the problems
> I am having is where I have the following type of entry:
> dn: cn=Web Content Administrators,o=oldhammbc, c=uk
> cn: Web Content Administrators
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: qmailUser
> qmailUID: 503
> qmailGID: 507
> accountStatus: active
> deliveryMode: forwardonly
> mail: XX.XXX.XXXXXXX@oldham.gov.uk
> mailForwardingAddress: XX.XXX.XXXXXXX@oldham.gov.uk
> uid: XX.XXX.XXXXXXX
> subschemaSubentry: cn=Subschema
> This is incorrect as it has no structural object class and I am
> getting the following error when I try to add the entry "slapadd:
> dn="cn=Web Content Administrators,o=oldhammbc,c=uk" (line=38): (65) no
> structural object class provided"
> I don't need any of the data in inetOrgPerson, or
> organizationalPerson, so how can I make accounts like this go into the
> LDAP? Can I change the qmailUser schema so that it is a structural
> object class?
> Or could I create a new qmailForwardUser.schema that allows this type
> of account and add that to every "forward" account?
You're already using cn, so you could use the person objectclass. It only
requires cn and sn. You could just make sn, the same as cn.