[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: index_param failed on uniqueMember ?

--On Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:25 PM -0800 Eddy Tan <eddy_hs@yahoo.com> wrote:

Feb 11 14:35:41 slapd[23900]: conn=12 op=2 SRCH
Feb 11 14:35:41 slapd[23900]: conn=12 op=2 SRCH attr=gidNumber
Feb 11 14:35:41 slapd[23900]: <= bdb_equality_candidates:
(uniqueMember) index_param failed (18)

I knew one difference is that u r using OpenLDAP 2.1.X, most
of the discussions are based on 2.2.X.

Yup, thatÂs the obvious difference, but it'll less likely be possible for me to upgrade to 2.2.X at least until debian has its package.

Why don't you just build your own OpenLDAP 2.2 install separate from the debian install. Debian is never going to be as up to date as you'll need it to run a directory service.


Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/Shared Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

"These censorship operations against schools and libraries are stronger
than ever in the present religio-political climate. They often focus on
fantasy and sf books, which foster that deadly enemy to bigotry and blind
faith, the imagination." -- Ursula K. Le Guin