[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Odd problem with open-ldap
- To: OpenLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org
- Subject: Re: Odd problem with open-ldap
- From: Matt <mhoppes@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:45:01 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=nFuDAbXomYaNItknyH6k8buVeOi8zh/nekvvg2zK3+ZHVDxb04ORoWraVgVsKcXo+HDuC9oNxJ9DJG4cOiGgA2O/8TdMBSOFYkCJCSz8jnrVt1U+k7epITPwT7w4O2Uc/vLIw75vuJxILQ9kjMhvhHa7/Nbci/oB0wOuVgzgpFw=
- In-reply-to: <c11d025305010407193c03eb11@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <A04B6AE6ED3BD742B64D5B17093F64E2913082@IMSSGPX01.ims.mhm.mhc> <c11d02530412311049486fc9da@mail.gmail.com> <154C65FAD539AE01F6B2F145@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu> <c11d025304123111363f30bf0d@mail.gmail.com> <c11d0253050104065922aac2f0@mail.gmail.com> <c11d025305010407193c03eb11@mail.gmail.com>
Just for the record and anyone else searching.. my problem was not the
database format (though after all this I do intend to upgrade).. it
was my ACL:
# Define global ACLs to disable default read access.
threads 10
Apparently that was prohibiting things from being added as quickly as
they should have.