[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Creating empty groupOfUniqueNames..
Would you mind explaining what you mean by "rather useless in the LDAP
context"? I am using groupOfUniqueNames instead of groupOfNames as any
group I want to define will only list each member entry once. Are you
simply saying that I might as well use groupOfNames and don't worry
The name is quite misleading, since "member", the member attribute of
"grouOfNames" does not allow duplicate values as well. If you spend
some time reading the definition of "uniqueMember", you'll find out that
its syntax is __NOT__ "distinguishedName", but "nameAndOptionalUID",
which means a DN plus something else (I don't want to go into details,
read the specs), which can be absent and, as such, tricks many people
into believing that "uniqueMember" is a DN, "groupOfNames" is bad and
"groupOfUniqueNames" is the holy graal.
SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497