[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: Is it normal?
Okay, to be more specific RH9 (kernel 2.4.20SMP), Openldap 2.2.13
(replaced with .19 yesterday), BDB 4.2.52, OpenSSL 0.9.7d.
After I replaced .13 with .19 yesterday, memory used by OL increased
only to 13MB. Will keep looking.
[mailto:owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org] On Behalf Of Tony Earnshaw
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:31 AM
To: OpenLDAP software list
Subject: Re: Is it normal?
ons, 01.12.2004 kl. 20.43 skrev Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> > I am using Openldap 2.2.13 as LDAP backend for Samba.
> > Total number of records in the database is about 150, but slapd for
> > reason consumes 140Megs of RAM and this number grows (last time I
> > checked few days ago was 68). I was looking everywhere but never
> > what could actually cause this, so if this question is old, just let
> > know where I can find more information about this issue.
> > Thanks in advance.
> There were some memory and cache leaks fixed in the 2.2.19 release
> solve this problem.
People *must* give OS and distro for reference, plus supporting
After months of uptime on RHAS3, self-compiled 2.2.17/Cyrus SASL
2.1.18/BDB4.2.52, openssl 0.9.7d (up to 80 concurrent users, total in
that time ~1.000 users) and after 5 days of uptime RHAS3 self-compiled
2.2.18/Cyrus SASL 2.1.20/BDB 4.2.52/Openssl 0.9.7d (only 2-3 concurrent
users) slapd doesn't even show up in top. ps auxwww shows 8368 RSS,
194024 VSZ on this (5 days up) rig.
This could have far more to do with the supporting system than with the
OL version alone.
Nothing sucksseeds like a pigeon without a beak ...
They love us, don't they, They feed us, won't they ...