[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?

To: "OpenLDAP Software List" <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
From: Bruno Negrão <vpopmail@engepel.com.br>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:55:29 -0200
References: <A04B6AE6ED3BD742B64D5B17093F64E291300D@IMSSGPX01.ims.mhm.mhc> <20041125105622.F40513@mippet.ci.com.au>

Hi all,

I saw the following affirmative here on this list:

 Note in  particular that Solaris has its own version of LDAP
and that RedHat distributions are invariably broken in some way.

Dave Horsfall

I'm starting to use redhat's openldap and I still didn't notice any problem. Does someone know any problem related to the redhat's openldap distribution? Am I suposed to remove it and reinstall openldap from the source?

thanks, bruno

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
  - From: Andreas Hasenack <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
- How to get the Directory's last modification time?
  - From: Bruno Negrão <vpopmail@engepel.com.br>
- Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
  - From: Tony Earnshaw <tonye@billy.demon.nl>

References:
- Why is the difference of "objectclass: organization" and "objectclass: domain"?
  - From: "Tay, Gary" <Gary_Tay@platts.com>
- Re: Why is the difference of "objectclass: organization" and "objectclass: domain"?
  - From: Dave Horsfall <daveh@ci.com.au>

Prev by Date: OpenLDAP+Password-Policies
Next by Date: Re: openldap 2.1.30 + gentoo +ssl [self signed problem again]
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread