[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Solaris Shared memory setup

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Solaris Shared memory setup
From: Scott Walker <scott.walker@magma.ca>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:00:05 -0400
Cc: Openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <DBFB9C998F4AE3206DB77ED8@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>
Organization: Magma Communications Ltd.
References: <40EF5210.50806@realss.com> <0B1B20F749556499A3D51608@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu> <40F008F8.3020808@realss.com> <9ECB5F7654AE8366588BFE1D@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu> <411BD9ED.40005@magma.ca> <5C2167A3E4B1D0BB341DB0E8@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu> <411CD7AD.7000903@magma.ca> <DBFB9C998F4AE3206DB77ED8@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Yep I think I will try solaris 8, I am very curious about
the difference in response!

Thanks again!

Hi Scott,
My test systems are 4 CPU Netra 1450's (which use the same CPU as the 420R, IIRC), with 3 GB of RAM. They are quite responsive to my testing (130 queries/second when I ran stats earlier this month with 2.2.15).
Is it possible for you to try Solaris 8?
--Quanah

References:
- Solaris Shared memory setup
  - From: Scott Walker <scott.walker@magma.ca>
- Re: Solaris Shared memory setup
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: Solaris Shared memory setup
  - From: Scott Walker <scott.walker@magma.ca>
- Re: Solaris Shared memory setup
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Solaris Shared memory setup
Next by Date: RE: dynamic vs static linking of db in 2.2.15
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread