[Date Prev][Date Next]
> | So, I assume that OpenLDAP doesn't require the objectclass to be
> | groupOfNames in order for the group functions to work. In
> which case,
> I can
> | go ahead with making the objectclasses posixGroup (since NSS *does*
> | the objectclass to be posixGroup) and add an auxilliary objectclass
> | that will allow for the member attribute.
> Or, you can just make one of them auxiliary ... and nothing
> else is really affected.
> I think there is a draft schema around that does that already.
I hate to mess with established schemas. There was a draft schema to make
posixGroup auxilliary (RFC2307bis) but it expired.