[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: 'suffix' in 'replica' slapd.conf directive deprecated?

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: 'suffix' in 'replica' slapd.conf directive deprecated?
From: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 18:07:07 -0300
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <63648.81.72.89.40.1089320438.squirrel@81.72.89.40>
References: <20040708204201.GL9481@conectiva.com.br> <63648.81.72.89.40.1089320438.squirrel@81.72.89.40>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i

On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:00:38PM +0200, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> > Am I reading this correctly? Is the "suffix" option being ignored?
> > If yes, why?
> 
> the "suffix" directive is honored by slapd, which logs the changes that
> match the suffix only for the appropriate replicas.  slurpd ignmores that
> directive because all it needs to do is take care of the log entries that
> are destined to a certain replica.
> 
> compare to the "replica" parsing in servers/slapd/config.c

You are right, sorry for the noise.

References:
- "suffix" in "replica" slapd.conf directive deprecated?
  - From: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
- Re: 'suffix' in 'replica' slapd.conf directive deprecated?
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>

Prev by Date: "suffix" in "replica" slapd.conf directive deprecated?
Next by Date: Re: "suffix" in "replica" slapd.conf directive deprecated?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread