[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: sample DB_CONFIG bdb backend docs : a must in faq-o-matic
I recommend working with what the Open LDAP developers prefer (FAQ-O-matic)
despite its' shortcomings; better good documentation in a suboptimal structure
than half-assed documentation everywhere.
Wiki (OK, actually Twiki) has been suggested before, but without the active
support of the OL core team it can't replace the FAQ-O-matic as the canonical
source for documentation. There are several OpenLDAP and LDAP wikis already in
existence, mostly languishing.
On 6 Jun 2004 at 19:40, Trevor Warren wrote:
> Wrt to the docs won't a SGML or such format make more
> sent just like what tldp has on offer. It's much
> cleaner, presentable and navigable. I understand the
> amount of effort gone into faq-o-matic but i really
> think we can always have a wiki extension to the docs
> somewhere thro a simple link.