[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: OpenLDAP 2.1 (?) on RedHat Enterprise summary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> [mailto:owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Medievalist
> I'll hit these one by one, to the best of my knowledge at this time.
> > * OpenLDAP 2.1 v. 2.2 - the sense seems to be that openldap
> 2.1.30 is where
> > I should focus my attention. Would anyone recommend that
> I jump to 2.2.11
> > instead?
> Many people will. I will not. I recommend 2.1.25 because
> that's what I am using successfully. 2.1.30 is too new for me.
Sounds like you have a pretty basic installation, and not much in the way of
session security. But even so, there's a back-ldbm indexing bug fixed in
2.1.30 that you should be aware of.
> I am happy with ldbm so far. I have no requirements it
> doesn't satisfy, so why should I bother with all that tuning?
Definitely use whatever works for you. Note that back-ldbm still benefits
from tuning (using dbcachesize in addition to cachesize) though.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support