[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Openldap 2.2.5 production-ready?
tor, 04.03.2004 kl. 18.41 skrev Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> >> What are peoples' views on using 2.2.6/BDB 4.2.52+2 patches, OS RedHat
> >> RHEL3/RHAS3 for production? (no backends, slurpd replication, DIT with
> >> max 500 DNs). Stability problems that I had with 2.2.5 seem to have
> >> "gone away".
> > Not for my production data.... too many errors still being reported
> > against syncrepl for my taste. With the recent fixes to get the logging
> > correct in 2.1.27, slurpd and 2.1 look like still cool for me.
> Hm... Tony said specifically, he'd be using slurpd for replication, not
> syncrepl. So I'm not clear the syncRepl bit you mention applies?
Thanks Frank, thanks Quanah :) Both views immensely appreciated.
mail: billy - at - billy.demon.nl