[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Openldap 2.2.5 production-ready?
--On Thursday, March 04, 2004 9:22 AM -0500 Frank Swasey
Today at 12:43pm, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
What are peoples' views on using 2.2.6/BDB 4.2.52+2 patches, OS RedHat
RHEL3/RHAS3 for production? (no backends, slurpd replication, DIT with
max 500 DNs). Stability problems that I had with 2.2.5 seem to have
Not for my production data.... too many errors still being reported
against syncrepl for my taste. With the recent fixes to get the logging
correct in 2.1.27, slurpd and 2.1 look like still cool for me.
Hm... Tony said specifically, he'd be using slurpd for replication, not
syncrepl. So I'm not clear the syncRepl bit you mention applies?
Principal Software Developer
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html