[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: slapd.conf cachesize only for ldbm?
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Kirk A. Turner-Rustin wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > I must not understand something here,
> Correct, but that's OK.
> > if I have slapd.conf configured:
> > database bdb
> > and am using sleepycat's Berkeley DB, then I am using back-bdb,
> > correct?
> Not necessarily. It depends on your version of OpenLDAP, which, on
> searching the archives for your messages, I find was originally 2.0.X,
> which does not support back-bdb.
Except I've taken the advice people have offered here and upgraded my
Openldap to 2.1.25 and have configured slapd to use bdb with Sleepycat
Berkeley 4.2.52, a more recent post where I describe what I am running
> > If so, then my question is, is back-bdb a LDBM?
> back-bdb is written to use Berkeley DB. back-ldbm may or may not use
> Berkeley DB, depending on how OpenLDAP was configured and built.
I know I am using back-bdb because my slapd.conf has:
And I know the difference between back-bdb and back-ldbm, I've read
those faq entries, thats why I switched from back-ldbm to back-bdb.
What I dont understand, and this is what my original post was about,
is this entry in the slapd.conf about the cachesize:
Specify the size in entries of the in-memory cache maintained by the
LDBM backend database instance. The default is 1000 entries.
Does this mean back-ldbm, or is LDBM (all caps) a general term which
actually means back-ldbm or back-dbd?
> You need to read these FAQ articles about the differences between the
> different back ends in general, and between back-bdb and back-ldbm
> in particular.