[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Object Class Violation

To: Asif Iqbal <iqbala@qwestip.net>
Subject: Re: Object Class Violation
From: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:25:48 -0200
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.30L2.0311061418310.1959-100000@qmail>
References: <20031106191313.GE1279@conectiva.com.br> <Pine.GSO.4.30L2.0311061418310.1959-100000@qmail>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:20:24PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> > organizationalUnit, because you need an "ou: hosts" attribute entry
> > at least if you are using that DN.
> 
> dn: ou=hosts,dc=qwestip,dc=net
> objectclass: top
> objectclass: organizationalUnit
> 
> Now I get Naming Violation
> 
> Is there a chart or some cheat sheet out there that I can laways refer to ?

You are missing the "ou: hosts" entry as I stated above. You always need an
entry with the RDN (in your case, ou=hosts).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Object Class Violation
  - From: Asif Iqbal <iqbala@qwestip.net>

References:
- Re: Object Class Violation
  - From: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
- Re: Object Class Violation
  - From: Asif Iqbal <iqbala@qwestip.net>

Prev by Date: Concurrent connections
Next by Date: Re: Object Class Violation
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread