[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: Openldap vs. IBM Directory Server
As far as I kno,
it is free when you buy DB2 licenses, not the other way round,
but, they might be changing license policies regularly, so for this you can
best ask IBM self.
From: Lee [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 22:34
Subject: Re: Openldap vs. IBM Directory Server
> Other than that, You immediatly recognize the UMICH implementation
> it, as it still is based heavily on that.
> Besides that, it is not a real ldapserver, but an ldap frontend to the
> database (which you have to buy!) so the free of IBM is different to
> free of IBM.
I was under the impression it came with a free DB2 license for use only
with the Directory Server. Are you positive you still have to buy a
> Just my opinion,
> Regards, Dolf
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 21:10
> To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> Subject: Openldap vs. IBM Directory Server
> Hey All,
> We are evaluating a switch to IBM Directory Server from our current
> openldap cluster due to openldap's lack of (or should i say buggy)
> multimaster support.
> I wanted to get an impression from users of this list that have
> experience with both servers, and what if any advantages OpenLdap has
> over IBM's Directory Server (which is also free).