[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: 2.1.17 performance issues
>> You were probably running LDBM before with 2.0.x. You may want to try
>> LDBM again if you don't need the transactional integrity of BDB...
> We use BDB with a particularly large DB (close to 300,000 people with
> 20+ attributes each), and have no performance problems to speak of.
> Our systems are heavily utilized 24/7. There are some basic
> configuration pieces to BDB that can help improve performance. I would
> be curious to know if your slowdowns happen to coincide with write
> activity. Also, have you looked at your BDB stats? Perhaps you have
> not allocated a large enough cache.
I'll take a look at these things in the future. For now, I've rolled back
to 2.0.27 on Linux. Just after I sent the original post, things got so
bad that slapd eventually didn't even respond to a -INT, and I eventually
ended up with corruption (slapcat won't even run to completion).
UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech State College