[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Meta Directory
Tod Thomas wrote:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
>> Jehan PROCACCIA wrote:
>>> Openldap with backend-meta !
>> Isn't that more an LDAP proxy giving on-line access to various data
>> sources with name mangling capabilities? A thing some vendors call
>> 'Virtual Directory'?
>> Whereas meta directories are typically used for syncing data off-line
>> from various sources.
> A "...successful metadirectory needs to be an information broker with a
> replication capability. It needs to run on a variety of platforms
> including NT, Unix, as well as the IBM S/390 mainframe. It needs to
> interoperate with other metadirectory solutions with support for LDAP,
> X.500, and Active Directory."*
Pretty much, isn't it?
Now the first question is: What do *you* wanna do with such a beast?
> It seems the definition of a metadirectory hasn't quite been pinned down
More or less a meta-directory is a programming framework with big libraries
for implementing the connectors.
> As I'm typing this I realize that given my above attempt at a definition
> LDAP becomes just another component within a group of data resources.
> Please define 'off-line' for me, I want to be sure of what you're
I have to admit that 'off-line' might be the wrong word. I meant that
meta-directories, in opposite to 'virtual directories', do not handle a
client request directly, gathering and massaging the results passed to the
client. Meta-directories are for implementing synchronization processes
working in the background, not upon end-user client's request.
BTW: We should switch over to email@example.com list with such a general topic...